Preserve the source
Keep a trace from every review item and draft call back to the title report or supporting document.
Why TitleDraft exists
Professional review should begin with organized work—not document archaeology.
Title reports are dense, linked instruments are scattered, and the CAD handoff often hides the path from source language to linework. TitleDraft was built to make that path visible.
Every item should answer two questions:
What did the source say?
What still needs professional judgment?
What did the source say?
What still needs professional judgment?
The operating idea
Junior drafting support with a disciplined source trail.
A surveyor should not have to wonder which page produced a call, whether a linked instrument was actually retrieved, or whether a clean-looking polygon was forced from incomplete language.
TitleDraft takes on the repetitive groundwork: inventorying exceptions, organizing instruments, extracting text, identifying potential drafting candidates, preparing draft CAD support, and packaging the open questions.
The responsible licensed professional remains in control. TitleDraft is not designed to make title, legal, boundary, easement, applicability, or certification decisions.
Operating principles
Flag uncertainty
Missing, illegible, ambiguous, and non-plottable material should be visible, not quietly normalized.
Separate draft from decision
CAD support can accelerate professional review without pretending to replace it.
Learn from real service work
The demand test is intentionally manual so repeated customer pain—not speculation—defines any future software platform.
Introductory service · $200
Bring one real title project.
No account. No subscription. Scope is confirmed before payment.